At BJP’s national executive meeting in Nagpur, the party leadership announced that they will again be highlighting the issue of building the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. This is an attempt to win back the electorate that regards this issue as important. But 16 years after the Babri Masjid demolition, the Indian electorate has moved away from the issue.
As the results of the State Elections 2008 show, the average voter is more interested in good governance A political party will win more seats by promising a better future than trying to revive the past, no matter how glorious.
The final solution to the Temple/Mosque issue is very simple - it is completely up to the people of Ayodhya, and no one else, to decide whether a temple or a mosque should be built on that disputed site. The municipality of Ayodhya should refer to their Master Plan for the city and after considering the city’s layout, the numerous temples and mosques that already exist in the city and the legacy they want to leave their future generation; determine the final solution - a temple, a mosque, a public building, a memorial, status quo etc. The people of Ayodhya should not let anyone else dictate to them what they should do with their city, specially not politicians who promise them a place of worship at the expense of good governance.
One may or may not need a place to pray, but one definitely needs good governance to not walk on filthy pot-holed roads leading to that place of worship. And in 2009, every voter is acutely aware of this.
February 9th, 2009 | Tags: Ayodhya issue, Election Issue, Lok Sabha elections, NDA/BJP | Category: Communalism, Elections, Indian Politics, NDA/BJP, Uttar Pradesh | Leave a comment